Cornelio v. Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies LLC

Plaintiff: Joao Cornelio
Defendant: Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies LLC
Case Number: 2:2010cv02023
Filed: September 21, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 24, 2012 62 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/24/12.(LAD)
November 22, 2010 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying the 19 Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/22/10.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cornelio v. Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joao Cornelio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies LLC
Represented By: Stephanie May Cerasano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?