Ruelas v. Ryan et al
John Raymond Ruelas |
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2010cv02058 |
September 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Mark E Aspey |
James A Teilborg |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER that 16 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted, the Petition is denied and dismissed, with prejudice, and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 20 Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability because dismissal of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/26/11. (LSP) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying 4 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 5 Petitioner's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying 6 Petitioner's Motion to Release. The Clerk must serve a copy of 1 Petition, 3 Supplemental Brief in Support of his Petition for Habeas Corpus, and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 10/5/10.(LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.