Kaulia v. Thomas et al
Abraham K Kaulia, IV |
Todd Thomas, Timothy Dobson, Ben Griego and Sean Miener |
2:2010cv02060 |
September 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
Mary H Murguia |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER (Service Packet), granting Plaintiff's 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Plaintiff's claim in Count I of the Complaint 1 that his due process rights were violated when he was placed in segregation for "2 to 3 y ears" as the result of an Administrative Segregation Placement Hearing is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; Defendants Todd Thomas, Timothy Dobson, Ben Griego, and Sean Miener must answer Plaintiff's c laim in Count I of the Complaint 1 that his placement in the SHIP Program violated Plaintiff's due process rights, and Defendants Todd Thomas and BenGriego must answer Count II of the Complaint; the Clerk must send Plaintiff a service packet i ncluding the Complaint 1 , this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Todd Thomas, Timothy Dobson, Ben Griego, and Sean Miener; Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk within 21 days; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 12/13/10. (REW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.