Gamez v. Ryan et al
||Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr
||Charles L Ryan, Unknown Pittario, G Fizer, Dennis Kendall and Unknown Party
||September 27, 2010
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Mark E Aspey (PS)
||Mary H Murguia
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 21, 2012
ORDER, striking the Third Amended Complaint and dismissing this action for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; this is without prejudice to the right of counsel to file a new and separate action on behalf of the proposed new plaintiffs in this case, Gamez, and the proposed class; we note that proposed plaintiff, Arizona Center for Disability Law, may not proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/21/12. (REW)
|December 2, 2010
ORDER, granting Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff is granted an additional 30 days within which to comply with the 11/3/10 Order by either filing a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or paying the $350.00 fil ing fee; Plaintiff should file a declaration signed under penalty of perjury if he is unable to file a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in compliance with the 11/3/10 Order due to circumstances beyond his control; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 11/29/10.(REW)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?