Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (Arizona) LLC et al v. Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company
Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (Arizona) LLC and Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (California) LLC |
Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company |
2:2010cv02252 |
October 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Roslyn O Silver |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 166 ORDER pursuant to Rule 56(d), the court GRANTS the plaintiffs' motion to defer Docket 107 and DENIES without prejudice the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment Docket 97 . Signed by Judge Joseph R Goodwin on 5/22/2012.(KMG) |
Filing 130 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 103 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim. The court ORDERS the parties to submit a joint statement that is no longer than three pages, single-spaced, that describesthe discovery that has be en conducted thus far, the discovery that remains, and summarizes any outstanding discovery disputes. In addition, the plaintiff is ORDERED to submit a statement explaining the status of its efforts to obtain approval to disclose technical documentat ion in this suit. This statement should include a list in chronological order of the actions it has taken thus far and what remains to be done, with specificity. Both the joint statement and the plaintiffs' statement are due by March 26, 2012. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Joseph R Goodwin on 3/15/12.(LAD) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, denying Ensign-Bickford's 18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim and for transfer; denying the 37 Motion for Transfer of Venue. Signed by Judge Joseph R Goodwin on 9/23/11.(REW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (Arizona) LLC et al v. Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (Arizona) LLC | |
Represented By: | Michael Andrew Oblon |
Represented By: | David Matthew LaSpaluto |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pacific Scientific Energetic Materials Company (California) LLC | |
Represented By: | David Matthew LaSpaluto |
Represented By: | Michael Andrew Oblon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company | |
Represented By: | Richard D Getz |
Represented By: | Sid Leach |
Represented By: | Patrick J Markey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.