Shaka v. Ryan et al
Shaka |
Charles L Ryan, Duane Belcher, Unknown Benavidez, Unknown Curran, Unknown Felkins and Unknown Long |
2:2010cv02253 |
October 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Yuma |
Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
Stephen M McNamee |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 317 ORDER denying 316 Plaintiff's Request/Motion for Certificate of Appealibility (C.O.A.). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 3/24/15.(LSP) |
Filing 312 ORDER granting 254 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 292 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is terminated with prejudice. The Clerk must enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 3/4/15.(LSP) |
Filing 298 ORDER overruling Plaintiff's objection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (Doc. 279 ). FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs Motion for Rule 60 relief (Doc. 280 ). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/31/2014.(KMG) |
Filing 288 ORDER that Plaintiff's request for a typewriter (Doc. 273 at 2) is denied. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/3/2014. (KMG) |
Filing 172 ORDER that Plaintiff's request that the Court refrain from using anything other than Shaka in the caption is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to mail a current copy of the viewable public docket to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 7/20/2012.(KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.