Levan v. Thomas et al
| John Levan |
| Unknown Snieder, Jody Bradley, Unknown Lewis and Todd Thomas |
| 2:2010cv02278 |
| October 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 10 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff's action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk must enter judgment of dismissal accordingly. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/6/11.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 5 Plaintiff's MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. Counts I and II and Defendants Thomas and Bradley are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Lewis and Sni eder must answer Count III. The Clerk must send Plaintiff a service packet including 1 Complaint, this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Lewis and Snieder. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to t he Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/26/11. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
