Yares v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
| Cynthia Roche Yares |
| Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated and Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE4 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-HE4 |
| 2:2010cv02575 |
| November 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting with prejudice 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for Defendants accordingly. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 1/19/12.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER that the Motion to Dismiss 10 is granted without prejudice. ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 12 is granted without prejudice. ORDER that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case with prejudice, and the lis pendens recorded against the Property shall be quashed. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/24/11.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to Maricopa County Arizona Superior Court (Dkt. 14) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Request for Summary Ruling (Dkt. 17) is DENIED. Plaintiff is ordered to respond t o the pending Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 10 & 12) within 14 days of this Order. If Plaintiff does not file a response within 14 days of this Order, then the Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss this action with prejudice, without further order of the Court, for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's orders. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants Does 1 through 15 are dismissed, because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for the use of fictitious defendants. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/12/11.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
