Szabo v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 24, 2011
ORDER ACCEPTING 13 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Voss. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting 15 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; dismissing as moot 3 Petitioner's Motion for Stay an d Abeyance, and denying 10 Petitioner's Motion for Expansion of the Record. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall TERMINATE this action. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/24/11. (LSP)
|January 3, 2011
ORDER granting 2 Petitioner's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk must serve a copy of 1 Petition, 3 Motion for Stay and Abeyance, and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of A rizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition and respond to the Motion to Stay and Abey within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply to the Answer and a separate reply to any Response to the Motion to Stay and Abey within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/3/11.(LSP)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?