Parker v. Stems et al
| Keith T Parker |
| J Stems and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2010cv02616 |
| December 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Yuma |
| Lawrence O Anderson |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 . Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice as untimely. Petitioner's Motion to Stay 9 is denied and a certificate of appealability is denied b ecause denial of the Petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/15/11. (TLJ)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER - The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Lawrence O. Anderson pursuant toRules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 12/9/10. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
