GEICO Indemnity Company v. Brown et al

Plaintiff: GEICO Indemnity Company
Defendant: Dana M Brown
Case Number: 2:2011cv00025
Filed: January 4, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 29, 2011 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Court will exercise its discretion under the Declaratory Judgment Act to decline to issue GEICO's requested declaratory relief 7 . ORDER denying 9 Brown's Motion to Dismiss as moot. ORDER granting 20 Jacob Ross Podolsky's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/29/11.(TLJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GEICO Indemnity Company v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GEICO Indemnity Company
Represented By: Steven S Guy
Represented By: Sheila K Carmody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dana M Brown
Represented By: Jacob Ross Podolsky
Represented By: David Edward Wattel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?