Dema v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
| Victor O'Neil Dema |
| Kendra Portillo, Amanda Jackson, Bobbie Harris, Shayla Paap, Arizona Department of Economic Security and Karla Miller |
| 2:2011cv00149 |
| January 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Lawrence O Anderson (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 6 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and the appeal filed on 4/25/11 (doc. 8) is deemed timely filed; denying 9 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/11.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER, that the Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus In the United States District Court For And By A Child Detained In Unlawful State Custody For Two Years Pursuant To 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241(C)(3) and § 2254(a) & (b)" (Doc. 1) and this acti on are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/24/11. (DMT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
