Campbell et al v. California Reconveyance Company et al
David M Campbell and Marie G Campbell |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, U.S. Bank NA, Unknown Parties and California Reconveyance Company |
2:2011cv00180 |
January 27, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER, granting Defendants' 60 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiffs' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; directing the Clerk to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/25/12.(REW) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 47 Motion for Extension of Time Deadline, Dispositive motions due by 6/29/2012. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/21/12.(REW) |
Filing 46 ORDER, Defendants shall, within 14 days of this order, produce to Plaintiffs (1) all documentation of the transfer of the note from First Magnus to Washington Mutual and subsequent transfers into and out of the Trust, and (2) all documentation of Deborah Brignac's authority to sign on behalf of MERS and U.S. Bank. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/1/12. (REW) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying 11 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Court will set a Rule 16 Case Management Hearing by separate order. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/5/2011.(NVO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.