Frame v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Vance V Frame
Defendant: Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Capital One NA, Chevy Chase Bank FSB and U.S. Bank NA
Case Number: 2:2011cv00201
Filed: January 31, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER that the 26 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Damages, Injunction, Declaratory and Other Equitable Relief is GRANTED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation's 27 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with prejudice is GRANTED with prejudice. Within 14 days of this Order, Defendant Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation may file an application for attorneys' fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-807 and Local Rule 54.2. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 09/02/11. (ESL)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Motions to Dismiss 46 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's request for an open-ended extension is denied. Plaintiff shall file a response to the pending motions to d ismiss 26 and 27 no later than 6/3/11. ORDER that Plaintiff's Consent to Withdraw 43 is DENIED without prejudice. ORDER the Motion for Summary Adjudication 44 is DENIED without prejudice (see attached pdf for complete information). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/25/11.(TLJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frame v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vance V Frame
Represented By: Douglas C Rhoads
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation
Represented By: Alison C Lienau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One NA
Represented By: Ryan Shawn Patterson
Represented By: Nicole Maroulakos Goodwin
Represented By: Kevin Duffy Quigley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chevy Chase Bank FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank NA
Represented By: Nicole Maroulakos Goodwin
Represented By: Ryan Shawn Patterson
Represented By: Kevin Duffy Quigley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?