Watson et al v. U.S. Bank NA et al
| John Wayne Watson and Laura W Watson |
| Home Loan Center Incorporated, TD Service Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, ReconTrust Company NA, Robert White, BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, U.S. Bank NA and Donna Hatcher |
| 2:2011cv00265 |
| February 9, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 22 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 7/15/11.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 14 Defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, ReconTrust Company, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss; granting 15 Defendant Home Loan Center, Inc.'s M otion to Dismiss and denying as moot 16 Defendant Home Loan Center, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Dispositon. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint by May 13, 2011. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case without further order if Plaintiffs fail to file an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 4/19/11.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
