Kiehle v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 18, 2013
ORDER that the Motion for Relief from Judgment, (Doc. 48 ), is denied. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/18/2013.(KMG)
|May 30, 2012
ORDER Petitioner's Amended Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 7 ) is denied. Petitioner's Motion for Cause Respondents to Serve Answer Pleading on Petitioner (Doc. 21 ) is dismissed as moot. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. [1 9]) is accepted in part and rejected in part. Petitioner is issued a Certificate of Appealability for the limited issue of whether the supplemental briefing denied him his Sixth Amendment rights because it presented a special circumstance where "the likelihood that any lawyer, even a fully competent one, could provide assistance is so small that a presumption of prejudice is appropriate." Cronic, 466 U.S. at 659660. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/30/2012. (KMG)
|March 24, 2011
ORDER that 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal without prejudice if petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/24/11. (LSP)
|March 2, 2011
ORDER that the 1 Petition is dismissed with leave to amend; Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is signed to file a an amended petition on a court-approved form. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to file an amended petition within 30 days from the date this Order is signed. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 03/02/11. (ESL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?