Fouchia v. Carlota Copper Company et al
Plaintiff: Edward J Fouchia
Defendant: Carlota Copper Company, Gold Canyon Mining & Construction LLC, Eddie Smutt, Unknown Smutt and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2011cv00374
Filed: February 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: 38 Defendant's Rule 16(f) Fed. R. Civ. P. Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert Testimony is GRANTED as follows: 1) The opinion testimony of Dr. Morris is admissible to the extent he expresses opinions formed during the course of treatmen t, but will otherwise be excluded. 2) The testimony of Dr. Holda is admissible to the extent he testifies to personal knowledge gained from examining Plaintiff, but will otherwise be excluded. 3) The testimony of Mr. Sims and Mr. Acock is excluded. F URTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 43 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order for Good Cause is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Expedited Deadline to File Reply is DENIED as moot. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 6/8/12. (NKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fouchia v. Carlota Copper Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlota Copper Company
Represented By: Wendi A Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gold Canyon Mining & Construction LLC
Represented By: Charles Stedman Hover, III
Represented By: Michael D Wolver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eddie Smutt
Represented By: Charles Stedman Hover, III
Represented By: Michael D Wolver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Smutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward J Fouchia
Represented By: Jules August Grandjean
Represented By: Trey A R Dayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?