Isbell v. Ryan et al
||William Mark Isbell
||Charles L Ryan, Alfred Ramos, Jack Heet, Ernie Trujillo, D Henderson and A Miser
||March 1, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Jay R Irwin
||James A Teilborg
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 6, 2011
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' 21 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and deni ed in part as follows: granted as to dismissal of damage claims under RLUIPA, damages claims against Ryan, and all claims against Miser; and denied in all other respects. Miser is dismissed. Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The remaining claims regarding denial of a vegetarian diet are the claim for injunctive relief under the First Amendment and RLUIPA and claim for damages under the First Amendment. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 12/06/11. (ESL)
|March 17, 2011
ORDER (Service Packet) that the Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. 1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Ryan, Ramos, Heet, Trujillo, Henderson, and Miser. Plaintif f must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 03/16/11. (ESL)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?