Wilcox et al v. Arpaio et al
|Mary Rose Wilcox and Earl Wilcox
|Lisa Aubuchon, Peter R Pestalozzi, David Hendershott, Anna Hendershott, William Montgomery, Joseph M Arpaio, Ava Arpaio, Andrew P Thomas, Anne Thomas and Maricopa, County of
|March 11, 2011
|US District Court for the District of Arizona
|Phoenix Division Office
|Neil V Wake
|Nature of Suit:
|Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|28 U.S.C. § 1441
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 6, 2012
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Charles Hoskins' Motion to Intervene (Doc.444 in CV10-2756) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mary Rose and Earl Wilcox's Request for Attorneys Fees and Costs (Doc. 457 in CV10-2756) is granted. Wil cox shall submit proof and itemization of her claim for further fees by July 21, 2012. The County may file a response by August 4, 2012. Wilcox may file a reply by August 11, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Maricopa County's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. 41 in CV11-0473) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that execution on the judgment (Doc. 39 in CV11-0473) is stayed pending appeal. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 7/5/12. (originally docketed in LEAD case CV10-2756-PHX-NVW, redocketed in this case to address motion ruling in this case).(LAD)
|June 1, 2012
ORDER: Plaintiffs Mary Rose and Earl Wilcox's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Stay Discovery Obligations (Doc. 355 in lead case) is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment be entered by separate document in favor of Plaintiffs Ma ry Rose and Earl Wilcox against Defendant Maricopa County in accordance with the settlement agreement made 04/09/12, as follows: Plaintiffs Mary Rose and Earl Wilcox shall have judgment against Defendant Maricopa County for: A. 1) $975,000.00 in principal damages and 2) $27,222.00 in attorney fees and $1,089.56 expenses since 04/09/12, and 3) interest on the foregoing amounts at the federal rate of.21% per annum from the date of judgment until paid. B. Except for the rights e xpressly stated in this judgment, all claims of Plaintiffs Mary Rose and Earl Wilcox that are brought or could have been brought in this action against any Defendant and that arise out of the transactions or occurrences alleged in this action are ext inguished. Other than as expressly provided in this judgment, the parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court reserves jurisdiction to decide the Motion to Intervene (Doc. 444 in lead case), which is not fully briefed, and Wilcox's claim for additional attorney fees award against Maricopa County on that motion. See order for details. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 6/1/12. (NKS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?