Trotter v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Trotter v. United States of America

Trotter v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Joshua Wayne Trotter
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2011cv00577
Filed:	March 28, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Edward C Voss (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Paul G Rosenblatt
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 11, 2012	Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 12 movant's Motion to Amend/Supplement Record. The movant's Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 4) is denied and that this action is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied because the dismissal of the movants § 2255 motion is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 4/11/12. (LSP)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 11, 2012

Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 12 movant's Motion to Amend/Supplement Record. The movant's Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 4) is denied and that this action is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied because the dismissal of the movants § 2255 motion is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 4/11/12. (LSP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trotter v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua Wayne Trotter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	David A Pimsner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?