Fox v. Coxcom Incorporated

Plaintiff: Joel Fox
Defendant: Coxcom Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2011cv00594
Filed: March 30, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 3, 2012 46 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER granting 39 Cox's Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDER vacating all pending deadlines, the Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/7/13, and the Jury Trial set for 7/15/13. ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to enter judgment for Defendant Cox, Plaintiff to take nothing, each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/3/12.(TLJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fox v. Coxcom Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joel Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coxcom Incorporated
Represented By: Mark P Hummels
Represented By: David B Rosenbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?