Beltran v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Beltran v. United States of America

Beltran v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Andrew Beltran
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2011cv00648
Filed:	April 4, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	David K Duncan
Presiding Judge:	James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2012	Filing 25 ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall file a copy of this Order in both case numbers listed above; the 12/15/11 Order (Doc. 65 in CR 09-667) is vacated as is the corresponding judgment (Doc. 24); It is further ordered that the 16 Report and Recom mendation is accepted and adopted; the motion to vacate sentence is granted as specified below, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment granting the motion; that as a result of the Court accepting the Report and Recommendation, which recommen ded the Judgment in CR 09-667 at Doc. 35 be vacated, the Judgment is vacated and CR 09-667 is re-opened; that the Government's motion to dismiss the indictment; in CR 09-667 (Doc. 64), without prejudice, is granted; the indictment is dismissed, without prejudice. As a result of this Order, the Clerk of the Court shall close the criminal case; that Beltran be released from custody, if applicable. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 01/11/12. (see attached pdf for complete details) (ESL)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2012

Filing 25 ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall file a copy of this Order in both case numbers listed above; the 12/15/11 Order (Doc. 65 in CR 09-667) is vacated as is the corresponding judgment (Doc. 24); It is further ordered that the 16 Report and Recom mendation is accepted and adopted; the motion to vacate sentence is granted as specified below, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment granting the motion; that as a result of the Court accepting the Report and Recommendation, which recommen ded the Judgment in CR 09-667 at Doc. 35 be vacated, the Judgment is vacated and CR 09-667 is re-opened; that the Government's motion to dismiss the indictment; in CR 09-667 (Doc. 64), without prejudice, is granted; the indictment is dismissed, without prejudice. As a result of this Order, the Clerk of the Court shall close the criminal case; that Beltran be released from custody, if applicable. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 01/11/12. (see attached pdf for complete details) (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beltran v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew Beltran
Represented By:	Robert N Udashen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Sharon K Sexton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?