Martin v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
| Samuel Martin |
| Corrections Corporation of America and Unknown Lapree |
| 2:2011cv00650 |
| April 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Jay R Irwin (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER, withdrawing the reference to the Magistrate Judge as to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; granting Defendant's 15 Motion to Dismiss, the remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; the action is terminated; the clerk must enter judgment accordingly; pursuant to 18:1915(a)(3), an appeal from the judgment in this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/6/12. (REW)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim 1 . Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fa ils to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28:1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/11.(TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
