Quantum Information Specialists et al v. United State of America et al
| James L McNully, Gilbert F R Rau, Quantum Information Specialists and Leonard J Pearlstein |
| Executive Branch Government, United States Department of Defense, Unknown Parties and United States of America |
| 2:2011cv00677 |
| April 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 33 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction FURTHER ORDERED granting 47 Motion to Seal FURTHER ORDERED Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/9/12. (MAP)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER - Plaintiffs' third amended complaint (Doc. 30) is construed as the active complaint, and Defendant is directed to file a response or other appropriate motions by January 13, 2012. The motion to remove Quantum as a plaintiff (Doc. 28) is g ranted. The Clerk shall remove Quantum as a party to this matter. The motion for oral argument (Doc. 29) is denied. The motion requesting the status of the case (Doc. 31) has been granted by entry of this order. (See document for details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/19/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as set forth above. The second amended complaint (Doc. 19) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Quantum shall not file an amended complaint without representation by a licensed attorney. Plaintiffs shall have one additional opportunity to file an amended complaint on or before October 31, 2011. (See document for details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/4/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 12 Motion for Status of Case. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/14/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER - The motion to dismiss (Doc. 11) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this order. The amended complaint (Doc. 4) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs shall have until July 22, 2011 to file, consistent with this order, a second amended complaint. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action without further order of the Court if Plaintiffs fail to meet this deadline. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/11.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
