Graham-Miller v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
||Zsa Zsa Graham-Miller
||Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Quality Loan Service Corporation, CitiMortgage Incorporated, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated and K. Hovnanian American Mortgage LLC
||April 27, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||James A Teilborg
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 21, 2012
ORDER granting 47 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as set forth in this Order, Defendant Quality must file any reasonable request for attorneys' fees and denying without prejudice to refiling the Defendants' request for attorneys' fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 51 Defendants' Request for Ruling. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/21/12.(LSP)
|February 8, 2012
ORDER granting 7 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and granting 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting 25 Plaintiff's Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement, which the Court has construed as a moti on to amend. Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall dismiss this case with prejudice if Plaintiff fails to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Authentication of Official Documents Related to Fraud and denying 34 Plaintiff's Motion to Review Notary Public Oath and Certificate of Filing for Authentication. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 2/8/12.(LSP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?