Rybolt v. Ryan
||Danny El Rybolt
||Charles L Ryan
||June 3, 2011
||Arizona District Court
||Phoenix Division Office
||David K Duncan (PS)
||Paul G Rosenblatt
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 7, 2013
ORDER denying 53 Motion to Correct Errors in Document Number: 51 Court Order. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/6/13. (LAD)
|March 4, 2013
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Motion to Reverse and Vacate as Judgment is Void-Rule 6(c)(4) (Doc. 31 ), motion to remove or strike lines 6-7 of page 2 of the Report and Recommendation (Docs. 39 & 40 ), Motion for Judgment of Acquittal - Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 29(a) (Docs. 42 & 46 ), Motion for a Franks Hearing Then a Judgment of Acquittal (Docs. 42 & 46 ), Motion for Compulsory Process a s a Constitutional Right of Petitioner/Full Disclosure ofAccounting Because of Fraud on Court (Docs. 44 & 49 ), Motion in Form of Declaration and Subpoena A.D.O.C. Records from I&I and or S.S.U. from 1998-1999 (Docs. 45 & 48 ), and Motion for Remedy for Injury and Damages (Doc. 50 ) are all denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and that this action is dismissed wit h prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue and that the petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal of the petitioner's habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 3/4/13. (LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?