Seaton v. Astrue

Seaton v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Allen Gene Seaton
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2011cv01143
Filed:	June 7, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Pinal
Presiding Judge:	Frederick J Martone
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 30, 2016	Filing 36 ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in the amount of $31,574.79. Defendant shall refund to plaintiff the remainder, if any, of any past due benefits withheld for potential attorney's fees. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/29/2016.(LMR)
March 22, 2012	Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING defendant's motion to remand (doc. 22 ). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ is directed to:(1) reevaluate the medical source opinions of record in determining plaintiff's RFC pursuant to the standards for weighing medical opinions listed in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d); (2) reevaluate the plaintiff's subjective symptoms in determining plaintif f's RFC; (3) obtain vocational expert testimony to determine the effect of plaintiff's specific functional limitations on his ability to perform work, if plaintiff's exertional capacity does not coincidewith an exertional level; (4) undertake a new step five analysis to determine whether there are jobs existing in significant numbers that plaintiff can perform given his age, education, work experience, and RFC. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/22/2012.(KMG)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 30, 2016

Filing 36 ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in the amount of $31,574.79. Defendant shall refund to plaintiff the remainder, if any, of any past due benefits withheld for potential attorney's fees. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/29/2016.(LMR)

March 22, 2012

Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING defendant's motion to remand (doc. 22 ). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ is directed to:(1) reevaluate the medical source opinions of record in determining plaintiff's RFC pursuant to the standards for weighing medical opinions listed in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d); (2) reevaluate the plaintiff's subjective symptoms in determining plaintif f's RFC; (3) obtain vocational expert testimony to determine the effect of plaintiff's specific functional limitations on his ability to perform work, if plaintiff's exertional capacity does not coincidewith an exertional level; (4) undertake a new step five analysis to determine whether there are jobs existing in significant numbers that plaintiff can perform given his age, education, work experience, and RFC. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/22/2012.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seaton v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allen Gene Seaton
Represented By:	Mark Ross Caldwell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?