Robinson v. Ryan et al
| James E Robinson |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2011cv01383 |
| July 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Mohave |
| Michelle H Burns |
| G Murray Snow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER Magistrate Judge Burns' R&R (Doc. 13 ) is accepted. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. A Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/11/2012. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, recommending that Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) be denied and dismissed with prejduice; and recommending that a Certificate of Appealaibility and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 5/16/12. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
