Sperling v. Werner Enterprises Incorporated

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Sperling v. Werner Enterprises Incorporated

Sperling v. Werner Enterprises Incorporated

Plaintiff:	Stanna Lee Sperling
Defendant:	Werner Enterprises Incorporated
Case Number:	2:2011cv01447
Filed:	July 21, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 7, 2011	Filing 8 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Cancel/Rescind Stipulation; Motion to Not Dismiss Complaint; Motion for Leave to Amend; Motion for Doctrine of Eq uitable Tolling; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support (Doc. 6) is denied as to the Motion to Cancel/Rescind Stipulation; Motion to Not Dismiss Complaint; and Motion for Doctrine of Equitable Tolling and granted as to the Motion for L eave to Amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by October 21, 2011. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case without further order if Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by October 21, 2011. (See document for details). Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 10/7/11.(LAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 7, 2011

Filing 8 ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Cancel/Rescind Stipulation; Motion to Not Dismiss Complaint; Motion for Leave to Amend; Motion for Doctrine of Eq uitable Tolling; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support (Doc. 6) is denied as to the Motion to Cancel/Rescind Stipulation; Motion to Not Dismiss Complaint; and Motion for Doctrine of Equitable Tolling and granted as to the Motion for L eave to Amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by October 21, 2011. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case without further order if Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by October 21, 2011. (See document for details). Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 10/7/11.(LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sperling v. Werner Enterprises Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stanna Lee Sperling
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Werner Enterprises Incorporated
Represented By:	Sherida Colvin
Represented By:	Mark Ogden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?