Haug v. Midstate Mechanical Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Jon Haug
Defendant: Midstate Mechanical Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, Midstate Mechanical Incorporated and Midstate Mechanical Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan
Case Number: 2:2011cv01584
Filed: August 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 20 Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief with regard to the request for § 502(c)(1) penalties. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/8/12.(DMT)
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 AMENDED ORDER re 16 Order - granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss 7 Plaintiff's Second and Third Claims for Relief and the request for § 502(c) damages found in the First Claim for Relief. Granting Plaintiff leave to amend the C omplaint with respect to the First Claim for Relief. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within ten (10) days of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within that time, the Court will not consider his request for §502(c) damages. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 2/23/12. (DMT)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. See PDF document for details. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 10 days of this Order. The Clerk shall dismiss this case if plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 2/22/12.(LSP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haug v. Midstate Mechanical Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midstate Mechanical Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Represented By: Suzanne Lorraine Diaz
Represented By: Barney Myer Holtzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midstate Mechanical Incorporated
Represented By: Barney Myer Holtzman
Represented By: Suzanne Lorraine Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midstate Mechanical Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plan
Represented By: Suzanne Lorraine Diaz
Represented By: Barney Myer Holtzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jon Haug
Represented By: Daniel D Maynard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?