Whitehead v. Ryan et al
||Charles Jason Whitehead
||Charles L Ryan and Unknown Alhambra
||August 24, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||David G Campbell
||Mark E Aspey (PS)
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 14, 2012
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint ; the Clerk of Court must file the Second Amended Complaint attached to Document 15. The Clerk of Court must add C.O. III Samo as a Defendant to this action. Count II of the Sec ond Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Ryan, Maricopa County, and State of Arizona are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Nichols and Samo must answer Count I of the Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff's counsel a service packet including theSecond Amended Complaint (attached to Doc. 15), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Nichols and Samo. Plaintiff's counsel must complete and retur n the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/13/12.(DMT)
|November 23, 2011
ORDER denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 6 Motion for Information/Documents; denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Monetary Relief; granting 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g).Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/22/11.(DMT)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?