Brogdon v. Phoenix Police Department et al
| George Albert Brogdon, Jr. |
| Jay Gresset, Paul Mancha, Joseph Torres and Phoenix Police Department |
| 2:2011cv01675 |
| August 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Mark E Aspey (PS) |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER the reference to the magistrate judge is withdrawn as to 30 and granting 30 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, and his claims are dismissed without prejudice. The case is terminated, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The parties will bear their own costs. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/1/12.(TLJ)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER (Service Packet) the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 19 . Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 19 is denied. Count II (in part) of the First Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet for defendant City of Phoenix. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/11/12. (TLJ)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of George Albert Brogdon, Jr.. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/6/11. (TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
