Dancesport Videos LLC v. Kunitz et al
Plaintiff:
Dancesport Videos LLC
Defendant:
James Kunitz, Janna Kunitz, Digital Video Creations LLC and Body FX LLC
Case Number:
2:2011cv01850
Filed:
September 20, 2011
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
Maricopa
Presiding Judge:
David G Campbell
Nature of Suit:
Trademark
Cause of Action:
15:1051
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| November 1, 2012 | 151 |
ORDER denying 73 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 75 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 77 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 79 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; deny ing 81 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 83 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 97 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 104 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 108 Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims; denying 114 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/1/2012.(NVO)
|
| February 29, 2012 | 40 |
ORDER granting 24 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before 3-15-2012. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/29/2012.(NVO)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
