Palmer v. Jones et al
| Peter Michael Palmer |
| Kenton D Jones, Robert M Brutinel, John Pelander, W Scott Bales, Andrew D Hurwitz, Rebecca White Berch and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2011cv01896 |
| September 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the response (Doc. 29),1 the motion to disqualify the attorney general's office (Doc. 23) is denied.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the motion to dismiss (Doc. 18),2 the motion is granted; this case is dismissed, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that because this case is dismissed, Plaintiffs requests for injunctive relief (part of Doc. 5) are denied. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 12/16/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 1) is denied. (See document for details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/3/11.(LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
