St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company et al v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al
Travelers Indemnity Company of America, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company |
Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Great American Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Maryland Casualty Company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Interstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, American Safety Indemnity Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Transportation Insurance Company, First Specialty Insurance Company and American Home Assurance Company |
2:2011cv01954 |
October 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan R Bolton |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 394 ORDER granting 389 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief Opposing Efforts to Vacate this Court's Order Dated 8/15/2014. Del Webb is granted 21 days to file its brief. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/8/2014.(LMR) |
Filing 381 ORDER Declaring that St. Paul, Charter Oak, Travelers, Zurich, MCC, AGLIC, AHAC, CIIC, LIC, LMIC, OCIC, and ASIC, all have a duty to defend Del Webb as described in this Order. FURTHER ORDERED declaring that the proportional shares of defense cos ts for St. Paul, Charter Oak, Travelers, Zurich, MCC, AGLIC, AHAC, CIIC, LIC, LMIC, OCIC, and ASIC are equal to their respective policy limits quotients as described in this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court terminate the case. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 8/15/14. (MAP) |
Filing 379 ORDER pursuant to 377 Stipulation of Dismissal : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing with prejudice CNA's crossclaims against Zurich Group, AIG, LMIC, OCIC, and ASIC, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Zurich's and AIG's crossclaims against CNA, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. FURTHER ORDERED terminating CNA from the action as all claims, counterclaims, and crossclaims to which CNA was a party have been dismissed. (See Doc. 366). Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 7/2/2014. (ALS) |
Filing 375 ORDER pursuant to 371 Stipulation of Dismissal : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing without prejudice ASIC from AIG's crossclaims. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/25/2014. (ALS) |
Filing 374 ORDER pursuant to 370 Stipulation : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing without prejudice ASIC from Plaintiffs' claims. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/23/2014. (ALS) |
Filing 366 ORDER pursuant to the parties' 363 Stipulation. ORDERED dismissing with prejudice CNA and Zurich Group from Plaintiffs' claims. ORDERED terminating Steadfast Insurance Company from this action because the only claims asserted agai nst it have been dismissed. See LRCiv 15.1(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Plaintiffs from Zurich's Counter-Claim; dismissing with prejudice Plaintiffs from CNA's Counter-Claims. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/22/2014. (LFIG) |
Filing 350 ORDER granting 264 AHAC/CIIC'sMotion for Partial Summary Judgment Against LMFIC, denying 267 LMFIC's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiffs' and Cross-claimants' Claims. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 3/28/2014.(LMR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.