Murray v. Corrections Corporation of America Incorporated et al
Dwight Murray |
Gina Sween, Joe Stichen, Lorie LaClare, Charles DeRosa, Kash Elkins, Cary Davis and Unknown Bermudes |
2:2011cv02210 |
November 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Robert C Broomfield |
James F Metcalf |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER, pursuant to the Parties' 50 Stipulation, all claims filed in this action as to Defendant Cary Davis only shall be dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 1/9/13. (REW) |
Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, adopting the Magistrate Judge's 36 Report and Recommendation, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), the claims as against defendants Joe Stichen and Lorie LaClare are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/12/12. (REW) |
Filing 24 ORDER, withdrawing the reference to the Magistrate Judge as to Plaintiff's Motion for Prelimianry Injunction 14 and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 15 ; denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 15 Motion to Dismiss, the motion to dismiss is granted as to Count II, the motion to dismiss is otherwise denied. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 7/7/12.(REW) |
Filing 5 ORDER Defendant Corrections Corporation of America is dismissed. Plaintiff's claims, other than the First Amendment claim, are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Bermudes, Sween, Stichen, LaClare, DeRosa, Elkins, and Davis must answer the F irst Amendment claim in Plaintiff's Complaint. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/28/11. (NOTE: see attached pdf for complete details) (ESL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.