Rosenfield v. GlobalTranz Enterprises Incorporated et al

Plaintiff: Alla Josephine Rosenfield
Defendant: GlobalTranz Enterprises Incorporated, Andrew J Leto, Unknown Leto, Anthony Albanese, Unknown Albanese and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2011cv02327
Filed: November 23, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 2, 2012 52 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument currently set for 07/12/12 is VACATED. See order for complete details. Signed by Judge Neil V. Wake on 7/2/12. (NKS)
January 27, 2012 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 4 Defendants' Motion to Strike. The Clerk shall strike from the record the documents containing privileged materials [1,8]. ORDER that the parties shall file replacement documents omitting the privileged materials. ORDER granting jurisdiction to Maricopa County Superior Court and requests that the Superior Court strike paragraphs 44, 46, 47, and 48 from the Complaint (see attached pdf for complete information). Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 1/27/12.(TLJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosenfield v. GlobalTranz Enterprises Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alla Josephine Rosenfield
Represented By: Timothy James Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GlobalTranz Enterprises Incorporated
Represented By: Dinita L James
Represented By: Christopher Michael McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew J Leto
Represented By: Dinita L James
Represented By: Christopher Michael McFadden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Leto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Albanese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Albanese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?