RCC South LLC v. SFI Belmont LLC
| SFI Belmont LLC and SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC |
| RCC South LLC |
| 2:2011cv02356 |
| November 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Bankruptcy: Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. § 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL pursuant to stipulation #20 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: A. The above-captioned appeal is dismissed; and B. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/6/12. (LAD)
|
| Filing 21 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Case Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal Order Dismissing Appeal by Appellant RCC South LLC. (Rudd, Philip) |
| Filing 20 * Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal by RCC South LLC, SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC. (Rudd, Philip) * Modified to correct event and add filer on 4/3/2012 (LAD). |
| Filing 19 Notice from the Bankruptcy Court that the certificate that the Record on Appeal is Complete cannot be filed for the reason(s) stated in the attached document. (Bankruptcy Court - Phoenix, AZ) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/5/2011.(NVO)
|
| Filing 17 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge David G Campbell: Appearances: John Hebert,Philio Rudd,Michael Zimmerman, Nancy Stone for plaintiff; Craig Kaufman,Elizabeth Fella, Kelly Singer for defendant Motion Hearing held on 12/5/2011. ORDERED taking under advisement #4 Emergency Motion to Stay pending appeal. Court will issue an order by 5:00 p.m. 12/5/2011. (Court Reporter Patricia Lyons.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (TCA) |
| Filing 16 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #12 Additional Attachments to Main Document, Attachments to "Appendix in Support of Appellee's Objection to Appellant's 'Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal'" by Appellee SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Part 2, #2 Appendix Part 3, #3 Appendix Part 4, #4 Appendix Part 5)(Fella, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC identifying Corporate Parent SFI Belmont LLC for SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC.. (Fella, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RCC South LLC. (Rudd, Philip) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Hearing on Motion. A hearing on Debtor's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. 4) will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, December 5, 2011. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12-1-11. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC)
|
| Filing 12 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion, - Appendix Support of Appellee's Objection to Appellant's "Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal" by Appellee SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC. (Fella, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Sarah Fella on behalf of SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC (Fella, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 Emergency MOTION to Stay // Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal - Objection to Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal filed by SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC. (Fella, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 Emergency MOTION for Hearing on Motion re #4 Emergency MOTION to Stay // Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal // Motion for Expedited Hearing Regarding Debtor's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal - Objection to Motion for Expedited Hearing filed by SFI Raintree - Scottsdale LLC. (Fella, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED DOCUMENT by RCC South LLC. Amendment to #5 Additional Attachments to Main Document, // Amended Appendix of Documents Relating to Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Suspension of Chapter 11 Proceedings. (Rudd, Philip) |
| Filing 7 *ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENT - Proposed Order Granting #6 Emergency MOTION for Hearing on Motion re #4 Emergency MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal. Filed by RCC South LLC. (Rudd, Philip) Modified to correct event type on 12/1/2011 (LSP).* |
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION for Expedited Hearing re #4 Emergency MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal by RCC South LLC. (Rudd, Philip) |
| Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #4 Emergency MOTION to Stay // Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal // Appendix of Documents Relating to Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Suspension of Chapter 11 Proceedings by Appellant RCC South LLC. (Rudd, Philip) |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal by RCC South LLC. (Rudd, Philip) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to RCC South, LLC and SFI Belmont, LLC. (MHA) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Receipt of Bankruptcy Appeal (MHA) |
| Filing 1 Transmittal of Appeal/Bankruptcy Matter from Bankruptcy Court (Bankruptcy Appellate Panel File) by RCC South LLC. (MHA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
