Wilson v. Barcklay et al
| Van L Wilson |
| Karen Barcklay, Unknown Defranco, Unknown Salazar and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2011cv02376 |
| December 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Mohave |
| Edward C Voss (PS) |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER tht the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendant Barcklay's Motion to Dismiss Count II (Doc. 7). Defendant Barcklay's Motion to Dismiss Count II 7 is granted, and Barcklay is dismissed and Count II is dismissed without prejudice. The remaining claim is Count I against the Doe Defendants. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/10/12.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER (Service Packet)- IT IS ORDERED: Count III is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Defranco and Salazar are dismissed without prejudice.Defendant Barcklay must answer Count II of the First Amended Complaint.The Clerk of Court must send Plai ntiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint (Doc. 4), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendant Barcklay. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/21/12. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: (1) The summons issued by the Clerk of Court on December 6, 2011 is quashed. (2) The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amend ed complaint in compliance with this Order. (3) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 1/13/12. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
