Guzman-Martinez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Plaintiff: Tanya Guzman-Martinez
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Bo Campbell, Corrections Corporation of America, Chuck DeRosa, T Mohn, Unknown Adams, Justin Manford, Eloy, City of, Katrina S Kane, Earl Scalet and Michael Leal
Case Number: 2:2011cv02390
Filed: December 5, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 26, 2012 87 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, the CCA Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 73 by Corrections Corporation of America, Chuck DeRosa, T Mohn, and Captain Adams, joined by Defendant Justin Manford 75 , is granted, except that it is denied as to Defendant Justin Manford on Cou nt IV (battery); the Defendant City of Eloy's Motion to Dismiss 74 and the Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 78 by Defendants Katrina S Kane, Robert Campbell, and Michael Leal are granted; Counts I, II, and III of the Amended Complai nt are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Count IV of the Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted only with respect to Defendant Corrections Corporation of America; Count IV is not dismissed with respect to Defendant Justin Manford. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 11/26/12. (REW)
July 13, 2012 68 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER,Defendant City of Eloy's Motion to Dismiss 17 ; Defendants Corrections Corporation of America, Chuck DeRosa, and T Mohn's Motion to Dismiss 26 , joined by Defendant Donal Adams 38 ; and Defendants Katrina S Kane, Earl Scalet, Bo Ca mpbell, and Michael Leal's Motion to Dismiss 43 are granted; Counts I, II, IV, and V of the Complaint against Defendants Corrections Corporation of America, Chuck DeRosa, T Mohn, Donal Adams, and the City of Eloy are dismissed; Count III of the Complaint against Defendants Katrina S Kane, Earl Scalet, Bo Campbell, and Michael Leal is dismissed; Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint by 7/27/12. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 7/13/12. (REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guzman-Martinez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bo Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chuck DeRosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Mohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Manford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eloy, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katrina S Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earl Scalet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Leal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Guzman-Martinez
Represented By: Kristina Novotny Holmstrom
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Pochoda
Represented By: Kirstin Aki Story
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?