Moree v. Carrier IQ Incorporated et al
| Jerimiah Thomas Moree |
| Carrier IQ Incorporated, HTC Incorporated and HTC America Incorporated |
| 2:2011cv02409 |
| December 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2510 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jerimiah Thomas Moree. HTC Incorporated served on 12/16/2011. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jerimiah Thomas Moree. HTC America Incorporated served on 12/16/2011. (Holland, Eric) |
Filing 18
ORDER pursuant to 16 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint, the deadline for Defendants Carrier IQ and HTC America, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in the above-captioned case shall be extended until 45 days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues an order deciding the MDL motion, or as otherwise ordered by the MDL transferee court if the MDL motion is granted; provided, however, that in the event Defendant Carrier IQ or Defendant HTC America, Inc., should agree to an earlier response date in any of the MDL cases, Defendant Carrier IQ or Defendant HTC America, Inc., whoever of these two Defendants has so agreed, will respond to the complaint in the above-captioned case on that agreed date. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/10/12. (see order for full details)(DMT)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE re Notice Of Lodging Order by HTC America Incorporated re 16 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint . (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Baker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re 1 Complaint (First Request) by HTC America Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Baker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HTC America Incorporated. (Baker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Amy Baker on behalf of HTC America Incorporated (Baker, Jennifer) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE re Notice of Related Actions by Jerimiah Thomas Moree . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - JPML Notice of Related Actions, # 2 Exhibit B - JPML Motion for Transfer, # 3 Exhibit C - JPML Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer, # 4 Exhibit D - JPML Docket Sheet)(Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jerimiah Thomas Moree. Carrier IQ Incorporated served on 12/12/2011. (Holland, Eric) |
| Filing 11 Summons (Notice from National Registered Agents, Inc.) Returned Unexecuted as to HTC Incorporated. (DMT) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 8 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Steven J Stolze on behalf of plaintiff Jerimiah Thomas Moree. (BAS) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Steven L Groves on behalf of plaintiff Jerimiah Thomas Moree. (BAS) |
| PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 50, receipt number PHX116897 as to Steven J Stolze. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 50, receipt number PHX116898 as to Steven L Groves. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jerimiah Thomas Moree. (Rosenblatt, Burton) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting 5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Eric D Holland on behalf of Jerimiah Thomas Moree. (BAS) |
| PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 50, receipt number PHX116695 as to Eric D Holland. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Carrier IQ Incorporated, HTC America Incorporated, HTC Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons)(REK). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number PHX 0970-6142570. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 11-02409-PHX-DGC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Jerimiah Thomas Moree (submitted by Burton Rosenblatt). (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons)(REK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $350.00, receipt number PHX 0970-6142570, filed by Jerimiah Thomas Moree (submitted by Burton Rosenblatt). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
