Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Pinkhasov
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated |
Edward Pinkhasov |
2:2011cv02437 |
December 8, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Frederick J Martone |
Cable/Satellite TV |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER granting 20 plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the amount of $15,000. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 8/23/12.(LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Pinkhasov | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Thomas P Riley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Edward Pinkhasov | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.