Reader v. Bank of America NA et al
| Helen E Reader |
| Bank of America NA, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, ReconTrust Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2011cv02461 |
| December 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER: Because there are no genuine issues of material fact and because defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, it is ORDERED GRANTING defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45 ), and DENYING plaintiff's Cross Mot ion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 54 ). All pending hearings and deadlines are vacated. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case and enter final judgment in favor of defendants. See document for further details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 08/03/2015.(REK)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER denying plaintiff's 16 request as moot; denying plaintiff's 7 motion to remand and plaintiff's 9 motion to disqualify counsel; granting defendants' 8 motion to dismiss. We urge plaintiff to consult with a lawyer. If she does not have one, she may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of the Maricopa County Bar Association at 602-257-4434. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 01/27/12. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
