Woods v. Scottsdale, City of et al
||J Semora, Jesse Lee James, Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles, Arizona Department of Transportation, Unknown Parties, Unknown James, Unknown English, Unknown Semora, Scottsdale, City of and Keith English
||December 16, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||James A Teilborg
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 30, 2013
ORDER that Defendants Arizona DMV, Arizona DOT, Jessie Lee James and Jane Doe James' 34 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint is granted. ORDERED that Defendants City of Scottsdale, Officer Keith English, Officer Janice Semora, as well Jane Doe English and John Doe Semora's Motion 36 to Dismiss Amended Complaint is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice; the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/27/2013.(LFIG)
|February 19, 2013
ORDER that City Defendants' 15 Motion to Dismiss is granted. ORDERED that State Defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss is granted. ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to amend only part of the Complaint. Specifically, Plaintiff is grante d leave to amend Counts Two, Three, and Four of the Complaint. Counts One and Five of the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss the entirety of Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/19/2013. (LFIG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?