Morgal v. Ryan et al
| Allan Kenneth Morgal |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2011cv02552 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pima |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Neil V Wake |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER AND DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 25 ) is accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing petit ioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ). The Clerk shall terminate this action. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Peti tion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Petitioner's Request for Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 30 ) the Court FINDS: Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are Denied. With regard to Counts 4 and 9, the Petition lacks a substantial question. All other counts are procedurally defaulted. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 2/20/13. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
