Tatonka Capital Corporation et al v. Trillion Partners Incorporated

Plaintiff: Tatonka Capital Corporation
Defendant: Trillion Partners Incorporated
Receiver: Byron P Smyl
Case Number: 2:2011mc00085
Filed: August 5, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tatonka Capital Corporation et al v. Trillion Partners Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tatonka Capital Corporation
Represented By: Denis H Mark
Represented By: Michael Leo Hall
Represented By: Derek F Meek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Receiver: Byron P Smyl
Represented By: John Cardinal Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trillion Partners Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?