Puparazzi Industries of America LLC v. Puparazzi Pet Spa LLC
Plaintiff:
Puparazzi Industries of America LLC
Defendant:
Puparazzi Pet Spa LLC
Case Number:
2:2012cv00084
Filed:
January 13, 2012
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit:
Trademark
Cause of Action:
15:1125
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
May 23, 2012 | 21 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Puparazzi Industries of America LLC v. Puparazzi Pet Spa LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Puparazzi Industries of America LLC | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey C Whitley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Puparazzi Pet Spa LLC | |
Represented By: | Gary William Newson |
Represented By: | Daniel J Noblitt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.