Davis v. Ryan et al
| Carl Dwight Davis |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2012cv00132 |
| January 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| G Murray Snow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Michelle Burns's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22 ) is ACCEPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carl Dwight Davis's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk o f Court is directed to enter judgment on this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED because Davis has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/10/2013. (KMG)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 Petitioner's MOTION/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk must serve a copy of 1 Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Responde nts must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/27/12. (LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
