Sodaro v. Arizona Supreme Court et al
| Jennifer Prager Sodaro |
| Arizona Supreme Court and Arizona Supreme Court Committee on Character and Fitness |
| 2:2012cv00371 |
| February 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER granting the 14 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff shall take nothing, and the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/18/13.(REW)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction 4 is granted, with prejudice as to these claims against these Defendants; the Clerk shall not enter judgment for Defendants at this time, as the Court is granting Pla intiff leave to amend to add possible other Defendants/claims; Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within 20 days; if Plaintiff does not file an Amended Complaint within 20 days, the Clerk shall dismiss the case with prejudice and enter judgment for Defendants; Defendants' Motion to Extend Time for Compliance with Rules 16 and 26 5 is denied as moot; if Plaintiff chooses to amend her Complaint, the Rule 16 and 26 deadlines will be addressed when this Court sets a Rule 16 scheduling conference. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/19/12. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
