Mothershed v. Oklahoma, State of et al
Plaintiff: George L Mothershed
Defendant: Oklahoma, State of, Steven W Taylor, Tom J Colbert, James E Edmondson, James R Winchester, Yvonne Kauger, Douglas L Combs, Joseph M Watt, Unknown Parties and John F Reif
Case Number: 2:2012cv00549
Filed: March 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Frederick J Martone
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER denying 43 plaintiff's Motion to Amend Findings and Conclusions. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 07/19/12.(KAR)
June 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING defendants' 27 , 28 motions to dismiss. DENYING defendants' 30 joint motion for stay, plaintiff's 21 motion for judgment as a matter of law, and plaintiff's 26 motion for preliminary injunction and declaratory relief as moot. DENYING plaintiff's 32 motion for sanctions and 34 motion to receive e-mail notification. The clerk shall enter final judgment. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/26/12.(DMT)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Disqualification or Recusal of the Judges of this District. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 5/10/12. (LMR)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 16 Plaintiff's Motion to allow electronic filing. DISMISSING without prejudice the first amended complaint for violating Rule 8(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff shall have to and including April 20, 2012 to file a second amended complaint that complies with Rule 8(a), Fed. R. Civ. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/3/12.(DMT)
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Dismissing the 1 complaint without prejudice for violating Rule 8, Fed. R. Civ. P. Plaintiff shall have 15 days from the date this order is filed to file an amended complaint in compliance with Rule 8. Denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Electronic Filing without prejudice to renewing it upon a showing that an amended complaint complies with Rule 8. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/19/12. (see order for full details)(DMT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mothershed v. Oklahoma, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George L Mothershed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oklahoma, State of
Represented By: Gina Lynn Hendryx
Represented By: Katherine McNeal Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven W Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom J Colbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E Edmondson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James R Winchester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yvonne Kauger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas L Combs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M Watt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John F Reif
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?